You Reap What You Sow...

That the administration has steadfastly ignored the causes and perpetrators of the Benghazi crime has led to the totally reasonably predictable commitment of ....

the Algerian crime.  So why is anyone surprised?  And why isn't anyone issuing a statement challenging the administration on this as well as Benghazi?  Why are the media totally ignoring the devastating consequences of the administration's incompetence, or worse, purposeful set up of the Embassy and our personnel?  Has America forgotten the heroes and victims of Benghazi?  I would like to think not, but I am beginning to think that Americans just don't want to think about unpleasant things.  When they are forced to ( like after Sandy Hook,) they seem to want to do something to make themselves feel better, rather than actually doing something perhaps more difficult that would actually make a difference.  Anything having to do with the problem of Islamic terrorism (a term no longer allowed in the administration documents) is skirted, allowed to die down, denied, explained away, or just ignored until it is cold.
How many of you have read anything in the mainstream media about the trafficking of young (11 and 12 year old) Christian girls to Muslim men?  Not much out there on it, but it is a big deal... hundreds have been sold, as allowed by that oh so culturally advanced authority, the Quran.

How about the honor killings of young women who are determined by their fathers or brothers to have done something unbecoming to Islam?  Or the beatings of very young children in madrassas as normal punishment for minor infractions and particularly failing to progress in their studies of Islam?  Or forced marriages of young girls to older men by their own parents?  Or female circumcision in Islamic enclaves even in non Islamic countries?  Heard anything about the Ft Hood terrorist recently?  Three years since his religiously motivated murder of people there, but no justice yet.  We won't even make him comply with UCMJ regs on facial hair.  We can't even call him a terrorist. 

Heard about the MyJihad program?  It is supposed to convince us that the term jihad really doesn't refer to violence against non Muslims, nope.  It is an outreach program.  Outreach.  Uh huh.  

No, if it has to do with Islam or terrorism, you aren't likely to read or hear much about it on CNN or the NY Times.  In fact, there is a considerable effort to promote Islam and even to "dialogue" with its most vicious elements, calling them non violent, decapitated, freedom promoting and other such swill.  The result of this has been to convince these elements that we are weak, lack impetus and willpower, and are in fact willing dhimmis to their cause.  All in the name of not appearing to be anti Islam.  Turkish PM Erdogan said it... there is no radical Islam, no moderate Islam, there is only Islam!  We should be listening to him.  He isn't kidding.



Will Kabul be next?

What? Surely They Jest?

 Judge in trial of Fort Hood jihad mass murderer removed for bias for requiring shaving of his beard

Read more here from Fox News release of the AP story. 

What the hell is wrong with this place?  The regs are clear, Nidal needs to shave.  To rule so makes the judge biased?  To follow the rules makes him unable to be objective in interpreting the law?  The Court of Appeals is the one not able to be objective.  They are far too interested in appearing pro Muslim to actually care about the law.  Sure, the article says the ruling isn't necessarily negated, but the message to the next judge is clear... be a dhimmi or be dismissed.  

It is consistent that the courts are always far more concerned about the rights of the criminal than the rights of the victim or the victim's family.  Or for that matter, the future victims.  Sure, they are accused not convicted until the end of the trial, but to coddle them to the extent the courts do ensures justice is seldom actually achieved.  I don't want medieval justice, just a reasonable time frame and reasonable treatment.  There really isn't any question as to Nidal's guilt here, the only question now is can the slimebag defense attorneys find a way to cheat the families of the people he murdered of any closure or justice.  

The man who shot Gabriel Giffords has already been tried and sentenced.  That was just a year ago.  Nidal's trial hasn't even begun for the murders he committed over three years ago.  Gee, I wonder why?  Could it be that the victims are unimportant to the legal system?  Or perhaps there are things that will come out in the trial that will prove to be an embarrassment to the Army, and others.   Certainly the Army did everything it could to ignore the mounting evidence of Nidal's growing radicalism.  Perhaps they are more interested in covering their own iniquities than in justice for the slain, or protection for the living.  Typical.